General Educators and Special Educators Roles in Implementing Response to Intervention in Reading in First and Second Grades: A Multi-Case Study
General Educators and Special Educators Roles in Implementing Response to Intervention in Reading in First and Second Grades: A Multi-Case Study
- Élisabeth Boily, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Canada
- Chantal Ouellet, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada
- Pascale Thériault, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Canada
Résumé
The purpose of this article is to present the results of a multi-case study aimed at defining the roles of general educators and special educators in the context of the implementation of the response to intervention (RTI) model in reading in three elementary schools. Three dyads were studied with interviews, direct observation, artifacts, and a logbook. The results show that the RtI implementation leads to a role transformation for the teachers and the remedial teachers, but this transformation is deeper for the teachers. The results revealed historical and theoretical confusions concerning the delimitation of the roles.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present the results of a multi-case study aimed at defining the roles of general educators and special educators in the context of the implementation of the response to intervention (RTI) model in reading in three elementary schools. Three dyads were studied with interviews, direct observation, artifacts, and a logbook. The results show that the RtI implementation leads to a role transformation for the teachers and the remedial teachers, but this transformation is deeper for the teachers. The results revealed historical and theoretical confusions concerning the delimitation of the roles.
Keywords
response to intervention, special educators roles, general educators roles, teaching reading, reading disabilities
To cite this article
Boily, É., Ouellet, C. et Thériault, P. (2024). General Educators and Special Educators Roles in Implementing Response to Intervention in Reading in First and Second Grades: A Multi-Case Study. Formation et profession, 32(1), 1-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.18162/fp.2024.822